Favorite Horror Films of The 1930s: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Standard

JekyllHyde1931

(https://en.wikipedia.org)

Based on Robert Louis Stevenson’s novel Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde from 1886 , which gave the world the epitome of the double, one of the central characteristics of the Gothic genre, this 1932 film is one of the best horror films of that decade or any other time. Robert Mamoulian directed and Adolph Zukor produced the film for Paramount.  Fredric March played Jekyll and Hyde and won the 1932 Oscar® for Best Actor. The film was expensive, coming in at approximately one half million dollars to make, and it was also a financial as well as critical success, making about one and one quarter million dollars–a huge amount of money in those days.

Jekyll_and_Hyde_Title

(https://en.wikipedia.org)

The film is an excellent adaptation of the novella, something I rarely say about any film.  I love films almost as much as I do books, but almost any adaptation of a film is inferior to the book. The novel has the ability to speak directly to the reader, and the reader’s mind creates images that go much further and deeper than the particular aspect of a director’s vision, at least usually.  Stevenson’s novella is oddly short and would have benefited from begin developed in much more depth.  I can speak to that in another post in the future.  This film develops much of what is only hinted at in the Victorian era novella and is one of the few examples of when a film is superior to the book on which it is based.

The book hints at being a metaphor for drug addiction and the concurrent behavior of addicts, when their worst selves emerge. This film, in a manner that is overt for the early 1930s, visually makes these suggestions.  When Jekyll transforms for the first time, Mamoulian uses Jekyll’s POV (point of view) and shows us the images whirling through his mind.  Rather than eliminating his negative and evil impulses, he manages to bring them out to the front, and Mr. Hyde indulges his desires.

The book and the film also speak to the issue of the misuse of science and the unguarded pursuit of knowledge. This hubris, always punished by the gods in Greek Drama, was seen earlier in Frankenstein, and it is an issue that will continue to haunt us not only in contemporary films such as Jurassic Park but also in the very real world of scientific research.  Atomic weapons immediately come to mind as an example of how science can produce terrible as well as wonderful ends.  This film, in Gothic fashion, speaks to the problems of scientific hubris, uncontrolled by ethics.

Fredric_March-1(https://en.wikipedia.org)

Fredric March was one of the great leading men of the time. He had a long and extraordinary career, including winning the Best Actor Oscar® two times.  Arguably, his performance in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was his best work of his career.

If you have never had the opportunity to watch this film, I recommend it highly.

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Favorite Horror Films of The 1930s: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

  1. It has been many years since I saw this film, but I clearly remember March and how great his performance was. Fredrick March was always enjoyable to watch, and in this film he played two distinctly different characters with exceptional skill. There have been other versions of the story. I remember one with Spencer Tracy, and another—I think a television version—with Jack Palance.

    Like

  2. OH! it was written by Robert Louis Stevenson! Have not seen this film. But have seen the later version, trying to think who was the actor that portrayed DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE.

    Like

  3. Oh goodness me.. This post enlightened me, a metaphor for drug addiction. Why, I never even in a 100 years would’ve thought about it. What great reference. 👏🏻👏🏻

    I must stop reading your posts now, or else I won’t have much left for tomorrow 😂😂😂

    Great blog Charles!! I love this stuff.. 🤗🤗

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Great post, Charles, as always, very pertinent to our times. I have seen several versions of this novel into film and the older versions are superb. They lend to the film an agelessness that is enhanced by time. I saw the Fredrick March film of this novel several times and I think, personally, is the best of many versions that are out there that I have seen. I did understand the “addiction” aspect early on, along with the mental illness – I just don’t know which came first. K D 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s